Ricoh GR vs Zeiss ZX1
90 Imaging
58 Features
54 Overall
56
67 Imaging
79 Features
62 Overall
72
Ricoh GR vs Zeiss ZX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Introduced April 2013
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 37MP - Full frame Sensor
- 4.34" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 51200
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 35mm (F2-22) lens
- 800g - 142 x 93 x 46mm
- Announced September 2018
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh GR vs Zeiss ZX1 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Ricoh GR vs Zeiss ZX1, both Large Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Ricoh and Zeiss. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the GR (16MP) and ZX1 (37MP) and the GR (APS-C) and ZX1 (Full frame) possess different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GR was launched 6 years before the ZX1 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Large Sensor Compact).
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the GR grades vs the ZX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Ricoh GR vs Zeiss ZX1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR & Zeiss ZX1. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Gallery & Zeiss ZX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Zeiss ZX1
| GR | ZX1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Zeiss ZX1 over the Ricoh GR
| ZX1 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2018 |  | April 2013 | More modern by 66 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen sizing | 4.34" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.34") |
| Screen resolution | 2765k |  | 1230k | Crisper screen (+1535k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Zeiss ZX1
| GR | ZX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Ricoh GR vs Zeiss ZX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh GR has outer measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Zeiss ZX1 has specifications of 142mm x 93mm x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GR vs Zeiss ZX1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the GR vs the ZX1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR and ZX1 is 90 and 67 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Zeiss ZX1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes only by checking specs. The pic below will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the GR and ZX1.
All in all, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GR featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Zeiss ZX1 will give extra detail utilizing its extra 21 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged GR is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR vs Zeiss ZX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh GR vs Zeiss ZX1 Specifications
| Ricoh GR | Zeiss ZX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Zeiss |
| Model type | Ricoh GR | Zeiss ZX1 |
| Class | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-04-17 | 2018-09-27 |
| Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 36 x 24mm |
| Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 864.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 37MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 7488 x 4992 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 255 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/2-22 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 4.34 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,230 thousand dot | 2,765 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 6,221 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 300 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/4000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) | 800 grams (1.76 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 142 x 93 x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 78 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 972 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB65 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC | 512GB internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $971 | - |
