Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung GX-10
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Successor is Samsung GX-20
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung GX-10, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the GX-10 (10MP) is pretty comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (APS-C).
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was unveiled 3 years later than the GX-10 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores vs the GX-10 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro & Samsung GX-10. The full galleries are available at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery & Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung GX-10
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | November 2009 | September 2006 | Fresher by 39 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 210k | Crisper screen (+710k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
GX-10 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung GX-10
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro provides exterior measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Samsung GX-10 has specifications of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung GX-10 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs the GX-10.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and GX-10 is 77 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing simply by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and GX-10.
As you can see, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro to produce extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more modern GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro provides an edge in sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung GX-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung GX-10 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2009-11-10 | 2006-09-21 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 50mm (1x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 180 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 453g (1.00 lbs) | 793g (1.75 lbs) |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $566 | $850 |