Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2012
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and Galaxy Camera 4G (16MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and Galaxy Camera 4G (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was unveiled 3 years before the Galaxy Camera 4G which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro grades versus the Galaxy Camera 4G in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G. The full galleries are available at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 0k | Crisper screen (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Galaxy Camera 4G | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2012 | November 2009 | Newer by 34 months | |
Screen dimension | 4.8" | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro offers outside dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G has sizing of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs the Galaxy Camera 4G.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Galaxy Camera 4G is 77 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing technical specs. The picture here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Galaxy Camera 4G.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G will deliver extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-11-10 | 2012-08-29 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4288 x 2848 | - |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 50mm (1x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 4.8 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 180 secs | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 453 gr (1.00 pounds) | 305 gr (0.67 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $566 | $550 |