Clicky

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL102

Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
 
Samsung SL102 front
Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Released November 2009
Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F) lens
  • 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
  • Released January 2009
  • Also Known as ES55
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL102 Overview

Below is a extensive assessment of the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL102, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and SL102 (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was launched 11 months later than the SL102 so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summary of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores against the SL102 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung SL102

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro SL102 
ReleasedNovember 2009January 2009More recent by 11 months
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 SL102 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 

Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung SL102

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro SL102 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to lug around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro comes with exterior dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has sizing of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

Check the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL102 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro compared to the SL102.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL102 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and SL102 is 77 and 96 respectively.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is difficult to imagine the difference between sensor measurements merely by looking at specs. The photograph below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and SL102.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will give you more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro should have an advantage in sensor tech.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Portrait photography camera
55
has manual focus
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
no liveview
sensor resolution low (12MP)
25
has face detect focusing
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Street photography with Samsung SL102
62
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
55
lighter than competitors (116 grams)
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography information
Samsung SL102 Sports photography information
32
sensor size is good (APS-C)
fixed focal length (50mm)
no liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
not so great battery pack (320 per charge)
no phase detect auto focus
16
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Travel photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Travel photography camera
49
has built in flash
not so great battery pack (320 per charge)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
62
lighter than competitors (116g)
has built in flash
very good max aperture (f)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low MP (10 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (35mm)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Landscape photography features
Samsung SL102 Landscape photography features
46
has manual focus
screen is a good size (3 inch)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (50mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
not so great battery pack (320 per charge)
27
very good max aperture (f)
manual focus not available
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
screen is small (2.5 inch)
manual mode not available
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Vlogging details
Samsung SL102 Vlogging details
20
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
does not offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no microphone support
30
very good max aperture (f)
has face detect focusing
lighter than competitors (116 grams)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have microphone port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL102 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung SL102
 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 MacroSamsung SL102
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Samsung SL102
Also referred to as - ES55
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2009-11-10 2009-01-08
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip GR engine III -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 370.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4288 x 2848 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 50mm (1x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Max aperture f/2.5 -
Macro focusing range 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 2.5"
Resolution of display 920k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 180 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/3200 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 453g (1.00 lb) 116g (0.26 lb)
Physical dimensions 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 320 photographs -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $566 $130