Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL102
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Released November 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Also Known as ES55
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Below is a extensive assessment of the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL102, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and SL102 (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was launched 11 months later than the SL102 so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summary of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores against the SL102 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro & Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung SL102
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2009 | January 2009 | More recent by 11 months | |
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
SL102 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung SL102
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro comes with exterior dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has sizing of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL102 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro compared to the SL102.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and SL102 is 77 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to imagine the difference between sensor measurements merely by looking at specs. The photograph below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and SL102.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will give you more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung SL102 |
Also referred to as | - | ES55 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-11-10 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 50mm (1x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 453g (1.00 lb) | 116g (0.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $566 | $130 |