Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL202
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL50
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Below is a comprehensive comparison of the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Samsung SL202, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is relatively comparable but the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and SL202 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was unveiled 9 months later than the SL202 and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro grades vs the SL202 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung SL202. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung SL202
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2009 | February 2009 | More recent by 9 months | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
SL202 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung SL202
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has got exterior dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Samsung SL202 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs the SL202.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and SL202 is 77 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out technical specs. The photograph here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and SL202.
As you can tell, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will provide extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more modern GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung SL202 |
Otherwise known as | - | PL50 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-11-10 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 50mm (1x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 453 gr (1.00 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $566 | $140 |