Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL620
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Additionally Known as PL65
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL620, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is relatively comparable but the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and SL620 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was manufactured 9 months later than the SL620 so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores against the SL620 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro & Samsung SL620. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung SL620
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2009 | February 2009 | Fresher by 9 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
SL620 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung SL620
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro provides exterior measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Samsung SL620 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL620 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs the SL620.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and SL620 is 77 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing merely by seeing specs. The photograph below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and SL620.
All in all, both of these cameras have got the exact same megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizing. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has got the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining bokeh simpler. The fresher GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung SL620 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung SL620 |
Otherwise known as | - | PL65 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-11-10 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 50mm (1x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 180s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 453 grams (1.00 lb) | 168 grams (0.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $566 | $200 |