Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung ST93
77 Imaging
51 Features
31 Overall
43


97 Imaging
38 Features
20 Overall
30
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched April 2011

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung ST93 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Samsung ST93, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and ST93 (16MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and ST93 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.

The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was announced 17 months prior to the ST93 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung ST93 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro matches up versus the ST93 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung ST93 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung ST93. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery and Samsung ST93 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung ST93
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | ST93 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
ST93 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2011 | ![]() | November 2009 | Newer by 17 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung ST93
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | ST93 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has got outside measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Samsung ST93 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Samsung ST93 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs the ST93.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and ST93 is 77 and 97 respectively.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to see the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading specifications. The picture below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and ST93.
Plainly, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Samsung ST93 will deliver extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung ST93 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung ST93 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung ST93 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-11-10 | 2011-04-20 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 50mm (1x) | () |
Maximal aperture | f/2.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 180s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 453 grams (1.00 lbs) | 110 grams (0.24 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $566 | - |