Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL320
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternate Name is WB1000
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Samsung TL320, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is relatively close but the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and TL320 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was brought out 9 months after the TL320 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro matches up vs the TL320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung TL320. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery and Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung TL320
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2009 | February 2009 | More modern by 9 months | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
TL320 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung TL320
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has got outside measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Samsung TL320 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Samsung TL320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro compared to the TL320.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and TL320 is 77 and 98 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes only by viewing specs. The picture here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and TL320.
All in all, both cameras offer the same exact resolution albeit different sensor sizes. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult. The fresher GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung TL320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung TL320 |
Also Known as | - | WB1000 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-11-10 | 2009-02-23 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 50mm (1x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.8-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 180 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 453g (1.00 lbs) | - |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $566 | $380 |