Clicky

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL320

Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
 
Samsung TL320 front
Portability
98
Imaging
35
Features
36
Overall
35

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Launched November 2009
Samsung TL320
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
  • n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
  • Announced February 2009
  • Alternate Name is WB1000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL320 Overview

Following is a detailed review of the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Samsung TL320, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is relatively close but the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and TL320 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was brought out 9 months after the TL320 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro matches up vs the TL320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung TL320

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro TL320 
AnnouncedNovember 2009February 2009More modern by 9 months
Screen resolution920k460kCrisper screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 TL320 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 

Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung TL320

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro TL320 
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurements
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has got outside measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Samsung TL320 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Samsung TL320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro compared to the TL320.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL320 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and TL320 is 77 and 98 respectively.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL320 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes only by viewing specs. The picture here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and TL320.

All in all, both cameras offer the same exact resolution albeit different sensor sizes. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult. The fresher GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL320 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography highlights
Samsung TL320 Portrait photography highlights
55
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
no liveview
megapixel count low (12MP)
34
has manual focus
includes face detection focus
external flash not possible
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Street photography advice
Samsung TL320 Street photography advice
62
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
58
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography highlights
Samsung TL320 Sports photography highlights
32
nice sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (50mm)
no liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
not so great battery (320 CIPA)
has no phase detect AF
30
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Travel photography factors
Samsung TL320 Travel photography factors
49
built-in flash
not so great battery (320 shots)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
59
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
low MP (12MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung TL320 as a Landscape photography camera
46
you can focus manually
screen size is good (3 inches)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (50mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
not so great battery (320 shots)
43
has manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Vlogging factors
Samsung TL320 Vlogging factors
20
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic port
31
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focus
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone port
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung TL320
 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 MacroSamsung TL320
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Samsung TL320
Also Known as - WB1000
Class Advanced Mirrorless Ultracompact
Launched 2009-11-10 2009-02-23
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by GR engine III -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 370.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 4288 x 2848 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 50mm (1x) 24-120mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.5 f/2.8-5.8
Macro focusing range 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Screen resolution 920k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 180 secs 16 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 5.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 453g (1.00 lbs) -
Dimensions 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 320 pictures -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $566 $380