Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB350F
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Announced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Revealed January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB350F, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and WB350F (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was announced 5 years earlier than the WB350F which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores versus the WB350F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro & Samsung WB350F. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung WB350F
| GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| WB350F | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | November 2009 | Newer by 50 months |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB350F
| GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro comes with outside dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has sizing of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB350F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro compared to the WB350F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB350F is 77 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by going through a spec sheet. The picture here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB350F.
Clearly, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro having a larger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Samsung WB350F will show more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will be behind in sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung WB350F |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-11-10 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | GR engine III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 50mm (1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 180 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 453 gr (1.00 lb) | 276 gr (0.61 lb) |
| Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $566 | $260 |