Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB35F
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB35F Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB35F, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and WB35F (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was manufactured 5 years prior to the WB35F which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro matches up vs the WB35F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB35F. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung WB35F
| GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| WB35F | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | November 2009 | Newer by 50 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB35F
| GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro provides exterior dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has specifications of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB35F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and the WB35F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB35F is 77 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading through technical specs. The pic here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB35F.
As you have seen, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Samsung WB35F will give more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung WB35F |
| Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-11-10 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | GR engine III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 50mm (1x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 180 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 453g (1.00 pounds) | 194g (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $566 | $130 |