Clicky

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB700

Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
 
Samsung WB700 front
Portability
98
Imaging
37
Features
21
Overall
30

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Launched November 2009
Samsung WB700
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
  • Announced December 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB700 Overview

Its time to look closer at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB700, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and WB700 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was announced 13 months earlier than the WB700 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB700 being a Compact camera.

Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro grades versus the WB700 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung WB700

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro WB700 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Screen resolution920k614kCrisper screen (+306k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 WB700 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
AnnouncedDecember 2010November 2009Fresher by 13 months

Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB700

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro WB700 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro offers outer dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Samsung WB700 has sizing of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB700 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs the WB700.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB700 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB700 is 77 and 98 respectively.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB700 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing merely by looking at specifications. The graphic underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB700.

To sum up, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Samsung WB700 will give more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB700 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography features
Samsung WB700 Portrait photography features
55
has manual focus
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
no liveview feature
low MP (12MP)
30
decent megapixels (14MP)
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Street photography information
Samsung WB700 Street photography information
62
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
49
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
low max ISO (0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography information
Samsung WB700 Sports photography information
32
sensor size is good (APS-C)
fixed focal length (50mm)
no liveview feature
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
bad battery power (320 CIPA)
lack of phase detect auto focus
28
decent megapixels (14MP)
can't change focal length (()mm)
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Travel photography features
Samsung WB700 Travel photography features
49
built-in flash
bad battery power (320 CIPA)
low MP (12MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
70
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
great maximum aperture (f)
does not have Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB700 Landscape photography factors
46
has manual focus
screen size is good (3")
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (50mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
no liveview feature
no image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
bad battery power (320 CIPA)
38
great maximum aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
decent megapixels (14MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
lacks RAW support
does not have Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Vlogging information
Samsung WB700 Vlogging information
20
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic support
27
great maximum aperture (f)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB700 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB700
 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 MacroSamsung WB700
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Samsung WB700
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2009-11-10 2010-12-28
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip GR engine III -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 370.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 4288 x 2848 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 3200 -
Min native ISO 200 -
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 50mm (1x) ()
Maximum aperture f/2.5 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 920 thousand dots 614 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 180 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 453 gr (1.00 lb) -
Physical dimensions 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 320 shots -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal -
Card slots 1 1
Launch pricing $566 $300