Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB700
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
98 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced December 2010
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB700, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and WB700 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was announced 13 months earlier than the WB700 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB700 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro grades versus the WB700 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro & Samsung WB700. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung WB700
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 614k | Crisper screen (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
WB700 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2010 | November 2009 | Fresher by 13 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB700
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro offers outer dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Samsung WB700 has sizing of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB700 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs the WB700.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB700 is 77 and 98 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing merely by looking at specifications. The graphic underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB700.
To sum up, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Samsung WB700 will give more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung WB700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung WB700 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-11-10 | 2010-12-28 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | - |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 50mm (1x) | () |
Maximum aperture | f/2.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 180 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 453 gr (1.00 lb) | - |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $566 | $300 |