Clicky

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB850F

Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
 
Samsung WB850F front
Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
51
Overall
43

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Released November 2009
Samsung WB850F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
  • Revealed January 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB850F Overview

Here is a thorough review of the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB850F, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and WB850F (16MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and WB850F (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was released 3 years prior to the WB850F and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB850F being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro matches up against the WB850F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung WB850F

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro WB850F 
Screen resolution920k614kClearer screen (+306k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 WB850F GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
RevealedJanuary 2012November 2009Fresher by 26 months

Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB850F

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro WB850F 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen sizing
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has got physical measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Samsung WB850F has specifications of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB850F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro against the WB850F.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB850F size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB850F is 77 and 91 respectively.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB850F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizing merely by checking out specifications. The visual underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB850F.

To sum up, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Samsung WB850F will show extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB850F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB850F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Portrait photography with Samsung WB850F
55
you can focus manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
does not have liveview
low resolution sensor (12MP)
43
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
offers face detection focus
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Street photography advice
Samsung WB850F Street photography advice
62
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (250g)
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography highlights
Samsung WB850F Sports photography highlights
32
good sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (50mm)
does not have liveview
max fps very slow (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
not so great battery pack (320 shots)
lacks phase detect AF
52
great zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Travel photography factors
Samsung WB850F Travel photography factors
49
flash built-in
not so great battery pack (320 CIPA)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
69
lighter than competition (250 grams)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (23mm)
very long reach (483mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Landscape photography with Samsung WB850F
46
you can focus manually
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (50mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
not so great battery pack (320 per charge)
49
has manual focus
rather wide (23mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Vlogging info
Samsung WB850F Vlogging info
20
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic jack
34
rather wide (23mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (250g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have external mic jack
Photography Glossary

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB850F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB850F
 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 MacroSamsung WB850F
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Samsung WB850F
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2009-11-10 2012-01-09
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by GR engine III -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 370.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 2848 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 50mm (1x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.5 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dot 614 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology - AMOLED display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 180s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/3200s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 3.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 453 grams (1.00 lbs) 250 grams (0.55 lbs)
Physical dimensions 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 320 pictures -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID - SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $566 $599