Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sigma Quattro
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Released November 2009
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Launched February 2016
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sigma Quattro, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and Quattro (29MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (APS-C).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was launched 7 years earlier than the Quattro which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro matches up vs the Quattro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sigma sd Quattro. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery and Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Sigma Quattro
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Quattro | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | November 2009 | Newer by 76 months | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 920k | Clearer display (+700k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sigma Quattro
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has outside dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sigma Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus the Quattro.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Quattro is 77 and 63 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading through specs. The image below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Quattro.
All in all, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Sigma Quattro to resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 17MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Sigma sd Quattro |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-11-10 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 29 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 50mm (1x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 180 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 3.8 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 453 gr (1.00 lbs) | 625 gr (1.38 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $566 | $738 |