Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A3000
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
69 Imaging
62 Features
54 Overall
58
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Announced August 2013
- Updated by Sony a3500
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A3000 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A3000, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and A3000 (20MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (APS-C).
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was introduced 4 years prior to the A3000 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A3000 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro matches up against the A3000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A3000 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sony Alpha A3000. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery and Sony A3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Sony A3000
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | A3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A3000 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
A3000 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2013 | November 2009 | Fresher by 46 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sony A3000
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | A3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A3000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro features outer dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Sony A3000 has dimensions of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") with a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A3000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and the A3000.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and A3000 is 77 and 69 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A3000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reviewing technical specs. The photograph below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and A3000.
As you have seen, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Sony A3000 to offer extra detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A3000 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Sony Alpha A3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Sony Alpha A3000 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2009-11-10 | 2013-08-27 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | GR engine III | BIONZ image |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 5456 x 3632 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 50mm (1x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 180s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, H.264, MP4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 453 grams (1.00 pounds) | 411 grams (0.91 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1068 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | 470 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $566 | $398 |