Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A390
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Announced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Previous Model is Sony A380
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A390 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Sony A390, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the A390 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (APS-C).
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was manufactured 8 months before the A390 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro grades versus the A390 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A390 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Sony A390
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
A390 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2010 | November 2009 | Newer by 8 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sony A390
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro enjoys exterior dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Sony A390 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") and a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Sony A390 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro against the A390.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and A390 is 77 and 66 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to see the difference between sensor dimensions merely by going over specifications. The picture here may give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and A390.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Sony A390 to offer you extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A390 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2009-11-10 | 2010-07-28 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR engine III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 50mm (1x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 453g (1.00 lb) | 549g (1.21 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 230 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $566 | $500 |