Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony NEX-5
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0919f/0919f1115fdda8c239848792f287f46b2d1eed67" alt="Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/526da/526dac145d03c96f401b53f00c4068ea38345a6c" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-5 front Sony Alpha NEX-5 front"
89 Imaging
54 Features
58 Overall
55
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony NEX-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 287g - 111 x 59 x 38mm
- Released June 2010
- Refreshed by Sony NEX-5N
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony NEX-5 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sony NEX-5, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the NEX-5 (14MP) is relatively close and they use the exact same sensor sizing (APS-C).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was manufactured 6 months earlier than the NEX-5 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores against the NEX-5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony NEX-5 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro & Sony Alpha NEX-5. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery & Sony NEX-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Sony NEX-5
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | NEX-5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
NEX-5 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sony NEX-5
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | NEX-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2009 | ![]() | June 2010 | Same age |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony NEX-5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro comes with physical measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Sony NEX-5 has proportions of 111mm x 59mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 287 grams (0.63 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sony NEX-5 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus the NEX-5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f164d/f164d146e85c4d25fd29969d0c1b638ef6cc0e30" alt="Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony NEX-5 size comparison Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony NEX-5 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and NEX-5 is 77 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0ee5/d0ee53a0b0e7be75a7f6c67760544a68dffa0417" alt="Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony NEX-5 top view buttons comparison Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony NEX-5 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony NEX-5 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by researching technical specs. The image here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and NEX-5.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Sony NEX-5 to result in more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9708d/9708d4f247a6154cf60844bcaaad697035a6d3c5" alt="Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony NEX-5 sensor size comparison Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony NEX-5 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony NEX-5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5efb/b5efb2a55328256fd1979aad2da2d216177ac70b" alt="Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony NEX-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony NEX-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony NEX-5 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Sony Alpha NEX-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Sony Alpha NEX-5 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-11-10 | 2010-06-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 50mm (1x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 180s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 12.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 453 grams (1.00 pounds) | 287 grams (0.63 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 111 x 59 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 796 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | 330 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $566 | $599 |