Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H200
77 Imaging
51 Features
31 Overall
43
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Revealed January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H200 Overview
Here is a extensive assessment of the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H200, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and H200 (20MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and H200 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was launched 4 years earlier than the H200 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summary of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro matches up against the H200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H200 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Sony H200
| GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| H200 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 | November 2009 | Fresher by 38 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sony H200
| GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro features physical measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Sony H200 has proportions of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") along with a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro compared to the H200.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and H200 is 77 and 67 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by going through specs. The visual underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and H200.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony H200 will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-11-10 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | GR engine III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 50mm (1x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.5 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 20cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 180s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 6.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 453g (1.00 lbs) | 530g (1.17 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 photos | 240 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $566 | $250 |