Clicky

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H400

Portability
77
Imaging
51
Features
31
Overall
43
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 front
Portability
62
Imaging
45
Features
41
Overall
43

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H400 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Launched November 2009
Sony H400
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
  • 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
  • Introduced February 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H400 Overview

On this page, we are contrasting the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sony H400, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and H400 (20MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and H400 (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was brought out 5 years prior to the H400 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H400 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores vs the H400 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Sony H400

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro H400 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Display resolution920k460kSharper display (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 H400 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
IntroducedFebruary 2014November 2009Fresher by 51 months

Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sony H400

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro H400 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display size
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry your camera, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has got exterior measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Sony H400 has sizing of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") having a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).

Check out the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sony H400 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro against the H400.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H400 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and H400 is 77 and 62 respectively.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H400 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by looking at technical specs. The photograph below will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and H400.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony H400 will give greater detail having its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H400 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography features
Sony H400 Portrait photography features
54
focusing manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no liveview feature
MP count low (12 megapixels)
40
decent megapixels (20MP)
comes with face detection focusing
no manual focus
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Street photography details
Sony H400 Street photography details
61
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
43
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than competition (628 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography details
Sony H400 Sports photography details
31
good sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (50mm)
no liveview feature
low fps (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
terrible battery pack (320 shots)
does not have phase detect AF
51
amazing zoom range (25-1550mm 62.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
max fps low (1.0 fps)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Travel photography information
Sony H400 Travel photography information
49
has built in flash
terrible battery pack (320 per charge)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
53
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
long reach (1550mm)
missing Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (628g)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Landscape photography features
Sony H400 Landscape photography features
46
focusing manually
screen is a good size (3")
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (50mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
terrible battery pack (320 CIPA)
44
really wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Vlogging features
Sony H400 Vlogging features
20
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
does not have a selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic support
26
really wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focusing
has external microphone support
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
more heavy than competition (628 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H400 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sony H400
 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 MacroSony Cyber-shot DSC-H400
General Information
Company Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400
Category Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-11-10 2014-02-13
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip GR engine III Bionz(R)
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 370.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4288 x 2848 5152 x 3864
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 50mm (1x) 25-1550mm (62.0x)
Max aperture f/2.5 f/3.4-6.5
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 920 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - Clear Photo LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 201 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Features
Minimum shutter speed 180 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 8.80 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) 1280 X 720
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 453 gr (1.00 lb) 628 gr (1.38 lb)
Physical dimensions 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 320 images 300 images
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $566 $268