Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H400
77 Imaging
51 Features
31 Overall
43


62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Introduced February 2014

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H400 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sony H400, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and H400 (20MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and H400 (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.

The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was brought out 5 years prior to the H400 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H400 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores vs the H400 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H400 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery & Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Sony H400
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | H400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
H400 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | ![]() | November 2009 | Fresher by 51 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sony H400
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | H400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has got exterior measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Sony H400 has sizing of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") having a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sony H400 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro against the H400.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and H400 is 77 and 62 respectively.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by looking at technical specs. The photograph below will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and H400.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony H400 will give greater detail having its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony H400 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-11-10 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | GR engine III | Bionz(R) |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 5152 x 3864 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 50mm (1x) | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.5 | f/3.4-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 201 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 8.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 X 720 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 453 gr (1.00 lb) | 628 gr (1.38 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 300 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $566 | $268 |