Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony QX100
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
92 Imaging
51 Features
44 Overall
48
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony QX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 179g - 63 x 63 x 56mm
- Released September 2013
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony QX100 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony QX100, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Lens-style by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and QX100 (20MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and QX100 (1") boast totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was announced 4 years before the QX100 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony QX100 being a Lens-style camera.
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro matches up against the QX100 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony QX100 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery & Sony QX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Sony QX100
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | QX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 0k | Sharper display (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX100 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
QX100 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2013 | November 2009 | Fresher by 46 months | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sony QX100
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | QX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony QX100 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera often, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has got external dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Sony QX100 has dimensions of 63mm x 63mm x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
See the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony QX100 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and the QX100.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and QX100 is 77 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony QX100 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to see the difference in sensor sizing just by looking through specifications. The graphic below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and QX100.
To sum up, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro having a larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Sony QX100 will result in extra detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony QX100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony QX100 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Lens-style |
Launched | 2009-11-10 | 2013-09-05 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Lens-style |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 160 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 50mm (1x) | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.5 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | - |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | Depends on connected smartphone |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 180 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | None |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 453 gr (1.00 lb) | 179 gr (0.39 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 63 x 63 x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | 200 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BN, |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $566 | $268 |