Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony T900
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced February 2009
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony T900 Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Sony T900, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the T900 (12MP) is very comparable but the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and T900 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was manufactured 9 months after the T900 so they are of a similar generation. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores versus the T900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Sony T900
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2009 | February 2009 | More modern by 9 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
T900 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 920k | Sharper display (+2k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sony T900
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has got outside measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Sony T900 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro against the T900.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and T900 is 77 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes merely by seeing a spec sheet. The picture underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and T900.
Clearly, both of those cameras provide the same megapixels but not the same sensor sizes. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro provides the larger sensor which will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler. The more recent GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony T900 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2009-11-10 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 50mm (1x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.5 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180s | 2s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/1000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 453g (1.00 lbs) | 143g (0.32 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $566 | $300 |