Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Zeiss ZX1
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
67 Imaging
78 Features
62 Overall
71
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Zeiss ZX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 37MP - Full frame Sensor
- 4.34" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 51200
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 35mm (F2-22) lens
- 800g - 142 x 93 x 46mm
- Announced September 2018
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Zeiss ZX1 Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Zeiss ZX1, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Zeiss. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and ZX1 (37MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and ZX1 (Full frame) have totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was introduced 10 years earlier than the ZX1 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Zeiss ZX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro matches up versus the ZX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Zeiss ZX1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro & Zeiss ZX1. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery & Zeiss ZX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Zeiss ZX1
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | ZX1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Zeiss ZX1 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
ZX1 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2018 | November 2009 | Newer by 108 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimensions | 4.34" | 3" | Larger display (+1.34") | |
Display resolution | 2765k | 920k | Sharper display (+1845k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Zeiss ZX1
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | ZX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Zeiss ZX1 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has got external dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Zeiss ZX1 has proportions of 142mm x 93mm x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") having a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Zeiss ZX1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro against the ZX1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and ZX1 is 77 and 67 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Zeiss ZX1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions merely by going over specs. The picture here may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and ZX1.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Zeiss ZX1 will deliver more detail using its extra 25 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Zeiss ZX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Zeiss ZX1 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Zeiss ZX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Zeiss |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Zeiss ZX1 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-11-10 | 2018-09-27 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 37 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 7488 x 4992 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 255 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 50mm (1x) | 35mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.5 | f/2-22 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 4.34 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 2,765 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 6,221 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 453g (1.00 pounds) | 800g (1.76 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 142 x 93 x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | 512GB internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $566 | - |