Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung CL5
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d8e0/7d8e0c6ccb8d05257a2818cad25bd8279ac31704" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d855c/d855c4cbe7d9d28e98143d16fe9df7ae12246ddd" alt="Samsung CL5 front Samsung CL5 front"
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Announced February 2009
- Other Name is PL10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung CL5 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung CL5, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and CL5 (1/2.5") provide different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was launched 2 years after the CL5 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 matches up vs the CL5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 & Samsung CL5. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery & Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung CL5
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | CL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2012 | ![]() | February 2009 | More modern by 36 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
CL5 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung CL5
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | CL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 enjoys outer dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") having a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) while the Samsung CL5 has proportions of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") with a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung CL5 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and the CL5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d69e/2d69ecce2aca571216b0700b01e987b3da2775ff" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung CL5 size comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung CL5 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and CL5 is 69 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63d85/63d85ac07fa22adfffe9e03eeb4b2c4d93492721" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung CL5 top view buttons comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung CL5 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes simply by viewing specs. The pic below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and CL5.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will result in more detail utilizing its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/933df/933df96e3cf44a6e5f57e61de455d63cb39cec46" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung CL5 sensor size comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung CL5 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96257/96257f1a86aa4576ee7d631fef14fbcf651b61c9" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung CL5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung CL5 |
Also Known as | - | PL10 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2012-02-02 | 2009-02-23 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-85mm (3.5x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-4.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 550g (1.21 lbs) | 141g (0.31 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $871 | $391 |