Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung EX2F
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d8e0/7d8e0c6ccb8d05257a2818cad25bd8279ac31704" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6aca2/6aca200b93ad4b88a49fc4b4a06d30e7e8a7882d" alt="Samsung EX2F front Samsung EX2F front"
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Released December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Here is a in depth overview of the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung EX2F, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and EX2F (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was revealed 10 months prior to the EX2F so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung EX2F being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summary of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 grades versus the EX2F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung EX2F. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery and Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung EX2F
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 0k | Sharper screen (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
EX2F | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | ![]() | February 2012 | Fresher by 10 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung EX2F
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 offers outer measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) and the Samsung EX2F has proportions of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung EX2F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs the EX2F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9af1e/9af1e96fa77c59cf14a1e190c1886b8a8a72861d" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung EX2F size comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung EX2F size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and EX2F is 69 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/755b5/755b5db3a43344283859e9ad8e7e7b92f8d0d14b" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung EX2F top view buttons comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung EX2F top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizing just by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and EX2F.
Clearly, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will deliver extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f5fc/8f5fc8df15199013a1f6974a2676c0e475b7d029" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung EX2F sensor size comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung EX2F sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00bfd/00bfd8ebae503585635a4b5e7fc1296fdb44f146" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung EX2F |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-02-02 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-85mm (3.5x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/1.4-2.7 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180 secs | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 550 grams (1.21 lbs) | 294 grams (0.65 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 48 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-90 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $871 | $478 |