Clicky

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ10W

Portability
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
 
Samsung HZ10W front
Portability
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Launched February 2012
Samsung HZ10W
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
  • 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
  • Released May 2009
  • Other Name is WB500
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ10W Overview

Below, we will be looking at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung HZ10W, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and HZ10W (10MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and HZ10W (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was brought out 2 years later than the HZ10W and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ10W being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 grades versus the HZ10W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung HZ10W

		

		

			
 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 HZ10W 
ReleasedFebruary 2012May 2009Fresher by 34 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

		

		

			
 HZ10W GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung HZ10W

		

		

			
 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 HZ10W 
Focus manually  Dial precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen  Neither features Touch screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison

		

		

			
If you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 enjoys external measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ10W has proportions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung HZ10W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 against the HZ10W.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ10W size comparison
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and HZ10W is 69 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ10W top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Typically, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading through technical specs. The graphic underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and HZ10W.
As you can tell, both the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will resolve more detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
	
			Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ10W sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Portrait photography features
Samsung HZ10W Portrait photography features
74
 has manual focus
 good MP (16MP)
 sensor size is nice (APS-C)
 supports face detect autofocus
 delivers RAW files
31
 you can focus manually
 provides face detect autofocus
 no manual exposure
 can't use external flash
 low MP (10 megapixels)
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Street Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Street photography information
Samsung HZ10W Street photography information
55
 sensor size is nice (APS-C)
 delivers RAW files
 screen is fixed
 lack of image stabilization
 more heavy than competition in class (550 grams)
52
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 screen does not articulate
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
 heavier than competition (249g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Sports Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sports photography advice
Samsung HZ10W Sports photography advice
48
 good MP (16MP)
 sensor size is nice (APS-C)
 painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
 lack of image stabilization
 lack of phase detect autofocus
26
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 low MP (10MP)
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary
Travel Comparison
 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Travel photography camera
 Samsung HZ10W as a Travel photography camera
59
 good MP (16MP)
 has built in flash
 decently wide (24mm)
 more heavy than competition in class (550 grams)
 does not have selfie friendly display
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
54
 built-in flash
 relatively wide (24mm)
 lack of Time Lapse mode
 heavier than competition (249 grams)
 low MP (10 megapixels)
 does not have a selfie friendly display
 sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Landscape Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Landscape photography details
Samsung HZ10W Landscape photography details
63
 has manual focus
 decently wide (24mm)
 good sized screen (3")
 good MP (16MP)
 sensor size is nice (APS-C)
 delivers RAW files
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
 lack of image stabilization
35
 you can focus manually
 relatively wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
 screen is somewhat small (2.7")
 no manual exposure
 low MP (10 megapixels)
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
 lack of Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Vlogging advice
Samsung HZ10W Vlogging advice
24
 decently wide (24mm)
 supports face detect autofocus
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
 does not have selfie friendly display
 lack of image stabilization
 low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
 lack of microphone port
 more heavy than competition in class (550g)
28
 relatively wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 provides face detect autofocus
 sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
 does not have a selfie friendly display
 video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
 lack of mic socket
 heavier than competition (249 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	

		

			
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung HZ10W
 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5Samsung HZ10W
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Samsung HZ10W
Also called as - WB500
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2012-02-02 2009-05-14
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 370.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 16:9, 4:3 and  3:2
Max resolution 4928 x 3264 3648 x 2432
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW files    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Autofocus touch    
Autofocus continuous    
Single autofocus    
Autofocus tracking    
Selective autofocus    
Center weighted autofocus    
Multi area autofocus    
Autofocus live view    
Face detect focus    
Contract detect focus    
Phase detect focus    
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-85mm (3.5x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/3.3-5.8
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 920k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch function    
Display technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 180s 16s
Max shutter speed 1/3200s 1/1500s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
Hot shoe    
AEB    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Mic port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 550 grams (1.21 pounds) 249 grams (0.55 pounds)
Dimensions 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 400 images -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB-90 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse feature    
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots One One
Retail cost $871 $300