Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ15W
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
90 Imaging
34 Features
31 Overall
32
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Alternate Name is WB550
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ15W Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ15W, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and HZ15W (12MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and HZ15W (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was brought out 2 years after the HZ15W which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ15W being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple overview of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 grades vs the HZ15W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ15W Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 & Samsung HZ15W. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery & Samsung HZ15W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung HZ15W
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | HZ15W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | February 2009 | More modern by 36 months | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
HZ15W | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung HZ15W
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | HZ15W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ15W Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 features external measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) and the Samsung HZ15W has dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
See the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ15W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus the HZ15W.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and HZ15W is 69 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ15W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through a spec sheet. The image here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and HZ15W.
As you can see, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will render greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The fresher GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung HZ15W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung HZ15W |
Also called as | - | WB550 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-02-02 | 2009-02-23 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-85mm (3.5x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180s | 16s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 550 gr (1.21 lb) | 249 gr (0.55 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $871 | $330 |