Clicky

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ25W

Portability
69
Imaging
57
Features
45
Overall
52
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
 
Samsung HZ25W front
Portability
70
Imaging
35
Features
32
Overall
33

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Released February 2012
Samsung HZ25W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
  • Launched July 2010
  • Alternative Name is WB5000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ25W Overview

On this page, we are analyzing the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ25W, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and HZ25W (12MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and HZ25W (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was announced 20 months after the HZ25W making them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ25W being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 matches up against the HZ25W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung HZ25W

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 HZ25W 
LaunchedFebruary 2012July 2010More modern by 20 months
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 HZ25W GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 

Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung HZ25W

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 HZ25W 
Manual focus Very accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 provides exterior measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") having a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) and the Samsung HZ25W has specifications of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") with a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).

Look at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ25W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and the HZ25W.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ25W size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and HZ25W is 69 and 70 respectively.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ25W top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading specifications. The image here might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and HZ25W.

To sum up, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will offer more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ25W sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Portrait photography information
Samsung HZ25W Portrait photography information
74
manual focus
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
has face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
34
has manual focus
delivers RAW formats
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Street photography information
Samsung HZ25W Street photography information
55
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than competitors in class (550g)
55
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sports photography highlights
Samsung HZ25W Sports photography highlights
48
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect AF
34
great zoom range (26-624mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Travel photography with Samsung HZ25W
59
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
more heavy than competitors in class (550g)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
52
flash built-in
really wide (26mm)
long reach (624mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Landscape photography factors
Samsung HZ25W Landscape photography factors
63
manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of image stabilization
43
has manual focus
really wide (26mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not available
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
missing Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Vlogging factors
Samsung HZ25W Vlogging factors
24
rather wide (24mm)
has face detect focusing
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing microphone jack
more heavy than competitors in class (550 grams)
24
really wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic socket
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung HZ25W
 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5Samsung HZ25W
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Samsung HZ25W
Otherwise known as - WB5000
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2012-02-02 2010-07-06
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 370.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4928 x 3264 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Highest enhanced ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 64
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-85mm (3.5x) 26-624mm (24.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/2.8-5.0
Macro focusing distance - 10cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 920 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 180s 16s
Fastest shutter speed 1/3200s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 5.60 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 550 grams (1.21 pounds) 428 grams (0.94 pounds)
Physical dimensions 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 400 pictures -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB-90 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SC/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $871 $350