Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX3000
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
89 Imaging
63 Features
62 Overall
62
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
- Released May 2014
- Previous Model is Samsung NX2000
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX3000 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung NX3000, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the NX3000 (20MP) is pretty well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (APS-C).
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was launched 3 years earlier than the NX3000 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a short summation of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 matches up versus the NX3000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX3000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung NX3000. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery and Samsung NX3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung NX3000
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | NX3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 461k | Crisper screen (+459k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
NX3000 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2014 | February 2012 | Newer by 28 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung NX3000
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | NX3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 enjoys external dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") having a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX3000 has sizing of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung NX3000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and the NX3000.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and NX3000 is 69 and 89 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specs. The picture here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and NX3000.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Samsung NX3000 to resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung NX3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung NX3000 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2012-02-02 | 2014-05-26 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Cross focus points | - | 1 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 24-85mm (3.5x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 461k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 180 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 550g (1.21 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
Dimensions | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") | 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 pictures | 370 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-90 | B740 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2-30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $871 | $897 |