Clicky

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX3000

Portability
69
Imaging
57
Features
45
Overall
52
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
 
Samsung NX3000 front
Portability
89
Imaging
64
Features
62
Overall
63

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Announced February 2012
Samsung NX3000
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
  • Released May 2014
  • Previous Model is Samsung NX2000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX3000 Overview

Its time to look a bit more closely at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung NX3000, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the NX3000 (20MP) is pretty well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (APS-C).

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was launched 3 years earlier than the NX3000 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a short summation of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 matches up versus the NX3000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung NX3000

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 NX3000 
Screen resolution920k461kCrisper screen (+459k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 NX3000 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
ReleasedMay 2014February 2012Newer by 28 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung NX3000

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 NX3000 
Focus manually Very accurate focusing
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 enjoys external dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") having a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX3000 has sizing of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

Examine the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung NX3000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and the NX3000.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX3000 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and NX3000 is 69 and 89 respectively.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX3000 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specs. The picture here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and NX3000.

As you can plainly see, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Samsung NX3000 to resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX3000 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Portrait photography with Samsung NX3000
74
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
78
focusing manually
good megapixels (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
comes with face detection focusing
exports RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Street photography camera
Samsung NX3000 as a Street photography camera
55
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
fixed screen
no image stabilization
heavier than competition (550g)
81
screen tilts up and down
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
lighter than competition (230g)
above average ISO range (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sports photography factors
Samsung NX3000 Sports photography factors
48
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
57
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
comes with tracking autofocus
low fps (5.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung NX3000 as a Travel photography camera
59
megapixel count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
heavier than competition (550g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
68
lighter than competition (230g)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Landscape photography with Samsung NX3000
63
you can focus manually
pretty wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
no image stabilization
73
focusing manually
switch lenses (Samsung NX mount)
nice screen size (3")
good megapixels (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
above average ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
lack of image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung NX3000 as a Vlogging camera
24
pretty wide (24mm)
includes face detect autofocus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have mic port
heavier than competition (550g)
34
comes with face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (230g)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
lack of external mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung NX3000
 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5Samsung NX3000
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Samsung NX3000
Type Advanced Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2012-02-02 2014-05-26
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.7mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 370.5mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4928 x 3264 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 3200 25600
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 35
Cross focus points - 1
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Samsung NX
Lens focal range 24-85mm (3.5x) -
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.5 -
Number of lenses - 32
Crop factor 1.5 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 920k dots 461k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 180 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4 H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 550g (1.21 lbs) 230g (0.51 lbs)
Dimensions 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 400 pictures 370 pictures
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model DB-90 B740
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (2-30 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $871 $897