Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung PL200
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched July 2010
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung PL200, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and PL200 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was brought out 19 months later than the PL200 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung PL200 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 scores vs the PL200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 & Samsung PL200. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery & Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung PL200
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | PL200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2012 | July 2010 | Fresher by 19 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
PL200 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung PL200
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | PL200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has got outer measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) whilst the Samsung PL200 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung PL200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 compared to the PL200.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and PL200 is 69 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and PL200.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will give more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The younger GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung PL200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung PL200 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-02-02 | 2010-07-21 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-85mm (3.5x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 180 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 550 gr (1.21 lbs) | 170 gr (0.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-90 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $871 | $0 |