Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL202
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Other Name is PL50
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL202, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and SL202 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was revealed 3 years after the SL202 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 scores versus the SL202 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung SL202. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung SL202
| GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2012 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 36 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
| SL202 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung SL202
| GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 comes with exterior measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") and a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL202 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus the SL202.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and SL202 is 69 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to see the difference between sensor sizes purely by going over technical specs. The pic here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and SL202.
As you have seen, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will offer more detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The newer GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also Known as | - | PL50 |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-02-02 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-85mm (3.5x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 180 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 550 grams (1.21 lbs) | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 400 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-90 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $871 | $140 |