Clicky

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL202

Portability
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
 
Samsung SL202 front
Portability
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Introduced February 2012
Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Revealed February 2009
  • Other Name is PL50
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL202 Overview

Its time to look a bit more closely at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL202, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and SL202 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was revealed 3 years after the SL202 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 scores versus the SL202 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung SL202

		

		

			
 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 SL202 
RevealedFebruary 2012February 2009More modern by 36 months
Manual focus  More exact focus
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

		

		

			
 SL202 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung SL202

		

		

			
 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 SL202 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  Missing selfie screen
Touch screen  Neither comes with Touch screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
When you are going to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 comes with exterior measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") and a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL202 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus the SL202.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and SL202 is 69 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Normally, it can be tough to see the difference between sensor sizes purely by going over technical specs. The pic here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and SL202.
As you have seen, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will offer more detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The newer GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
	
			Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Portrait photography with Samsung SL202
74
 manual focus
 MP count decent (16MP)
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 offers face detect focus
 supports RAW files
25
 includes face detect focus
 no manual focus
 manual mode not available
 no external flash support
 low MP (10MP)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW support
Photography Glossary
Street Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Street photography factors
Samsung SL202 Street photography factors
55
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 supports RAW files
 no articulating screen
 no image stabilization
 heavier than competition in class (550g)
47
 no articulating screen
 does not have image stabilization
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Sports Comparison
Sports photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Sports photography with Samsung SL202
48
 MP count decent (16 megapixels)
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
 no image stabilization
 no phase detect auto focus
16
 no shutter priority mode
 does not have image stabilization
 low MP (10MP)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 does not have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Travel Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Travel photography highlights
Samsung SL202 Travel photography highlights
59
 MP count decent (16MP)
 flash built-in
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 heavier than competition in class (550g)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
57
 built-in flash
 reasonably wide (28mm)
 doesn't have Time Lapse recording
 low MP (10 megapixels)
 doesn't have selfie friendly screen
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Landscape Comparison
 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Landscape photography camera
 Samsung SL202 as a Landscape photography camera
63
 manual focus
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 screen is a decent size (3")
 MP count decent (16 megapixels)
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 supports RAW files
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 no image stabilization
27
 reasonably wide (28mm)
 no manual focus
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
 small screen (2.7")
 manual mode not available
 does not have image stabilization
 low MP (10MP)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW support
 doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Vlogging advice
Samsung SL202 Vlogging advice
24
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 offers face detect focus
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 no image stabilization
 low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
 no mic port
 heavier than competition in class (550g)
27
 reasonably wide (28mm)
 includes face detect focus
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
 doesn't have selfie friendly screen
 does not have image stabilization
 low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
 doesn't have mic port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	

		

			
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung SL202
 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5Samsung SL202
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Samsung SL202
Also Known as - PL50
Type Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2012-02-02 2009-02-17
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 370.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3 and  16:9
Maximum resolution 4928 x 3264 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW files    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch focus    
Continuous autofocus    
Single autofocus    
Tracking autofocus    
Selective autofocus    
Center weighted autofocus    
Autofocus multi area    
Autofocus live view    
Face detection autofocus    
Contract detection autofocus    
Phase detection autofocus    
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-85mm (3.5x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focus range - 5cm
Crop factor 1.5 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 920 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch operation    
Screen technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 180 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/1500 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash range - 4.60 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
Hot shoe    
Auto exposure bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Mic jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 550 grams (1.21 lbs) 168 grams (0.37 lbs)
Dimensions 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 400 shots -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model DB-90 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes
Time lapse recording    
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $871 $140