Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL620
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Also referred to as PL65
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung SL620, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and SL620 (12MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and SL620 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was brought out 3 years after the SL620 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summary of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 grades against the SL620 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 & Samsung SL620. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung SL620
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | February 2009 | Newer by 36 months | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
SL620 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung SL620
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 features outside dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) and the Samsung SL620 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung SL620 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs the SL620.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and SL620 is 69 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specs. The image below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and SL620.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will deliver more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The younger GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung SL620 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung SL620 |
Also Known as | - | PL65 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2012-02-02 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-85mm (3.5x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 550 gr (1.21 lbs) | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $871 | $200 |