Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL720
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d8e0/7d8e0c6ccb8d05257a2818cad25bd8279ac31704" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cea25/cea2556b1a07c2d959f12ad972aaebab16e8ce4b" alt="Samsung SL720 front Samsung SL720 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL720 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Also referred to as PL70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL720 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung SL720, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and SL720 (12MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and SL720 (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was revealed 2 years after the SL720 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung SL720 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 matches up vs the SL720 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL720 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung SL720. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery and Samsung SL720 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung SL720
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | SL720 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 32 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL720 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
SL720 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung SL720
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | SL720 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL720 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 enjoys physical measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) and the Samsung SL720 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung SL720 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 against the SL720.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbdc2/cbdc2713cb9f665f19addf8bc316795c23920ab7" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL720 size comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL720 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and SL720 is 69 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5b6e/b5b6eccf4ea976e92166d47da35ac758d91ec94b" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL720 top view buttons comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL720 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL720 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specifications. The picture underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and SL720.
To sum up, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will give more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The more recent GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdcd0/cdcd0981c749ef6fe65b95ff271e254964f55408" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL720 sensor size comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL720 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL720 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2be83/2be83306afa9a338ffd5b9b41e99a284fe517d8a" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL720 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL720 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL720 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung SL720 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung SL720 |
Also referred to as | - | PL70 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2012-02-02 | 2009-07-14 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-85mm (3.5x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 550g (1.21 lb) | 168g (0.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-90 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $871 | $119 |