Clicky

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL320

Portability
69
Imaging
57
Features
45
Overall
52
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
 
Samsung TL320 front
Portability
98
Imaging
35
Features
36
Overall
35

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Revealed February 2012
Samsung TL320
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
  • n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
  • Revealed February 2009
  • Also Known as WB1000
Photography Glossary

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL320 Overview

Below is a thorough review of the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung TL320, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and TL320 (12MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and TL320 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was manufactured 2 years later than the TL320 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a concise view of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 grades vs the TL320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung TL320

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 TL320 
RevealedFebruary 2012February 2009More recent by 36 months
Screen resolution920k460kSharper screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 TL320 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 

Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung TL320

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 TL320 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 features outside dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) while the Samsung TL320 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Contrast the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung TL320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus the TL320.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL320 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and TL320 is 69 and 98 respectively.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL320 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's hard to see the difference between sensor measurements simply by looking at specs. The photograph underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and TL320.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will resolve more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL320 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Portrait photography with Samsung TL320
74
manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
includes face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
34
you can focus manually
supports face detect focus
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Street photography details
Samsung TL320 Street photography details
55
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than competition (550 grams)
58
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sports photography info
Samsung TL320 Sports photography info
48
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
lack of phase detect autofocus
30
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Travel photography info
Samsung TL320 Travel photography info
59
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
more heavy than competition (550g)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
59
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Landscape photography info
Samsung TL320 Landscape photography info
63
manual focus
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
MP count decent (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not have image stabilization
43
you can focus manually
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung TL320 as a Vlogging camera
24
really wide (24mm)
includes face detection autofocus
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone jack
more heavy than competition (550 grams)
31
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focus
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung TL320
 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5Samsung TL320
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Samsung TL320
Otherwise known as - WB1000
Type Advanced Mirrorless Ultracompact
Revealed 2012-02-02 2009-02-23
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 370.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4928 x 3264 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-85mm (3.5x) 24-120mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/2.8-5.8
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.9
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Display resolution 920k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 180 secs 16 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 5.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 550 gr (1.21 lb) -
Physical dimensions 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 400 photographs -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB-90 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $871 $380