Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL320
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Also Known as WB1000
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Below is a thorough review of the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung TL320, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and TL320 (12MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and TL320 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was manufactured 2 years later than the TL320 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a concise view of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 grades vs the TL320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung TL320. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery and Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung TL320
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | February 2009 | More recent by 36 months | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
TL320 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung TL320
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 features outside dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) while the Samsung TL320 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung TL320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus the TL320.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and TL320 is 69 and 98 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to see the difference between sensor measurements simply by looking at specs. The photograph underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and TL320.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will resolve more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung TL320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung TL320 |
Otherwise known as | - | WB1000 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2012-02-02 | 2009-02-23 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-85mm (3.5x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 550 gr (1.21 lb) | - |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $871 | $380 |