Clicky

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB150F

Portability
69
Imaging
57
Features
45
Overall
52
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
 
Samsung WB150F front
Portability
93
Imaging
37
Features
42
Overall
39

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Introduced February 2012
Samsung WB150F
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
  • Released January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB150F Overview

The following is a complete review of the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung WB150F, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is fairly close but the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and WB150F (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was manufactured at a similar time to the WB150F so they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera.

Before delving into a full comparison, here is a short introduction of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 matches up vs the WB150F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung WB150F

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 WB150F 
Display resolution920k460kSharper display (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 WB150F GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 

Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung WB150F

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 WB150F 
ReleasedFebruary 2012January 2012Same generation
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display dimensions
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison

When you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has got outer measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) while the Samsung WB150F has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).

Take a look at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung WB150F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus the WB150F.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB150F size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and WB150F is 69 and 93 respectively.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specifications. The picture below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and WB150F.

To sum up, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will provide you with extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a bit more aggressively.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Portrait photography with Samsung WB150F
74
manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
features face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
42
focusing manually
good megapixels (14MP)
supports face detect focusing
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Street photography with Samsung WB150F
55
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
more heavy than competitors in class (550g)
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (188g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB150F as a Sports photography camera
48
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
max frames per second very slow (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
does not have phase detect autofocus
51
incredible zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14MP)
supports tracking focus
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Travel photography info
Samsung WB150F Travel photography info
59
resolution is good (16MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
more heavy than competitors in class (550g)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
69
lighter than others in class (188 grams)
good megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
long zoom (432mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Landscape photography advice
Samsung WB150F Landscape photography advice
63
manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
no image stabilization
49
focusing manually
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Vlogging highlights
Samsung WB150F Vlogging highlights
24
fairly wide (24mm)
features face detection autofocus
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone port
more heavy than competitors in class (550 grams)
32
relatively wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focusing
lighter than others in class (188 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung WB150F
 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5Samsung WB150F
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Samsung WB150F
Type Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2012-02-02 2012-01-09
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 370.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4928 x 3264 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-85mm (3.5x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Max aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focus range - 5cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 920k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology TFT color LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 180s 16s
Maximum shutter speed 1/3200s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 550 grams (1.21 pounds) 188 grams (0.41 pounds)
Physical dimensions 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 400 images -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model DB-90 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Retail price $871 $230