Clicky

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB2200F

Portability
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
 
Samsung WB2200F front
Portability
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Introduced February 2012
Samsung WB2200F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
  • Announced January 2014
Photography Glossary

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview

Let's take a closer look at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung WB2200F, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is pretty well matched but the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and WB2200F (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was announced 23 months earlier than the WB2200F which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a short summation of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 grades vs the WB2200F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung WB2200F

		

		

			
 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 WB2200F 
Screen resolution920k460kCrisper screen (+460k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

		

		

			
 WB2200F GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014February 2012More recent by 23 months
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung WB2200F

		

		

			
 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 WB2200F 
Focus manually  More exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement
Selfie screen  Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  Missing Touch friendly screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison

		

		

			
In case you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has got physical dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has specifications of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung WB2200F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus the WB2200F.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and WB2200F is 69 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Often, it is tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements merely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and WB2200F.
As you can see, both of these cameras have the same resolution albeit not the same sensor measurements. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 contains the bigger sensor which is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult. The older GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
	
			Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Portrait photography features
Samsung WB2200F Portrait photography features
74
 has manual focus
 good MP (16 megapixels)
 sensor size is good (APS-C)
 has face detection autofocus
 saves RAW files
44
 you can focus manually
 sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
 features face detect autofocus
 external flash not possible
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Street Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Street photography details
Samsung WB2200F Street photography details
55
 sensor size is good (APS-C)
 saves RAW files
 screen does not articulate
 lack of image stabilization
 heavier than competition (550 grams)
40
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 no moving screen
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW files
 heavier than competition in class (708g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Sports Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sports photography info
Samsung WB2200F Sports photography info
48
 good MP (16 megapixels)
 sensor size is good (APS-C)
 very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
 lack of image stabilization
 lacks phase detect autofocus
53
 long zoom range (20-1200mm  60.0 x zoom)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
 features tracking focus
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Travel Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Travel photography factors
Samsung WB2200F Travel photography factors
59
 good MP (16 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 relatively wide (24mm)
 heavier than competition (550 grams)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly display
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
51
 sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 reasonably wide (20mm)
 very long reach (1200mm)
 lack of Time Lapse function
 heavier than competition in class (708 grams)
 doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Landscape Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Landscape photography advice
Samsung WB2200F Landscape photography advice
63
 has manual focus
 relatively wide (24mm)
 good sized screen (3")
 good MP (16 megapixels)
 sensor size is good (APS-C)
 saves RAW files
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
 lack of image stabilization
46
 you can focus manually
 reasonably wide (20mm)
 screen size is decent (3 inches)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW files
 lack of Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Vlogging information
Samsung WB2200F Vlogging information
24
 relatively wide (24mm)
 has face detection autofocus
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly display
 lack of image stabilization
 low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
 no external mic port
 heavier than competition (550 grams)
25
 reasonably wide (20mm)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 features face detect autofocus
 high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
 doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
 lack of mic support
 heavier than competition in class (708 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	

		

			
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung WB2200F
 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5Samsung WB2200F
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Samsung WB2200F
Type Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2012-02-02 2014-01-07
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 370.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3 and  16:9
Full resolution 4928 x 3264 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW files    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch to focus    
AF continuous    
Single AF    
Tracking AF    
AF selectice    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detection focusing    
Contract detection focusing    
Phase detection focusing    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-85mm (3.5x) 20-1200mm (60.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 10cm
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch capability    
Screen technology TFT color LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 200 thousand dots
Features
Lowest shutter speed 180s 1/8s
Highest shutter speed 1/3200s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual mode    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash distance - 6.00 m (ISO Auto)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix
External flash    
AEB    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic support    
Headphone support    
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 550 gr (1.21 lbs) 708 gr (1.56 lbs)
Physical dimensions 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 400 shots -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB-90 BP-1410
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) -
Time lapse recording    
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD, SDHC, SCXC
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $871 $599