Clicky

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB30F

Portability
69
Imaging
57
Features
45
Overall
52
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
 
Samsung WB30F front
Portability
96
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Announced February 2012
Samsung WB30F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2013
Photography Glossary

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB30F Overview

Below, we will be matching up the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung WB30F, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is relatively well matched but the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and WB30F (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was brought out 11 months earlier than the WB30F and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera.

Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 grades against the WB30F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung WB30F

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 WB30F 
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 WB30F GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013February 2012More modern by 11 months

Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung WB30F

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 WB30F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurements
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has outside measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB30F has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).

Take a look at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung WB30F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and the WB30F.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB30F size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and WB30F is 69 and 96 respectively.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at a spec sheet. The pic below might offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and WB30F.

As you can see, both the cameras have got the exact same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizes. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 comes with the bigger sensor which should make achieving shallower depth of field simpler. The more aged GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB30F as a Portrait photography camera
74
manual focus
MP count decent (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
comes with face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
35
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
includes face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Street photography with Samsung WB30F
55
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than competitors (550g)
64
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (128g)
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB30F as a Sports photography camera
48
MP count decent (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect AF
45
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Travel photography with Samsung WB30F
59
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
more heavy than competitors (550 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
69
lighter than competition in class (128g)
resolution is good (16MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
no Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Landscape photography details
Samsung WB30F Landscape photography details
63
manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
MP count decent (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not have image stabilization
43
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
lack of manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB30F as a Vlogging camera
24
pretty wide (24mm)
comes with face detect focusing
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone socket
more heavy than competitors (550 grams)
33
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
lighter than competition in class (128 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung WB30F
 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5Samsung WB30F
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Samsung WB30F
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2012-02-02 2013-01-07
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 370.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 4928 x 3264 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-85mm (3.5x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/3.1-6.3
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 920k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology TFT color LCD QVGA TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 180 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/3200 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 550g (1.21 lbs) 128g (0.28 lbs)
Dimensions 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 400 pictures -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model DB-90 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Retail pricing $871 $180