Clicky

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
69
Imaging
57
Features
45
Overall
52
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Introduced February 2012
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB350F Overview

Following is a in depth assessment of the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung WB350F, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is pretty comparable but the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and WB350F (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was brought out 23 months before the WB350F which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.

Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summation of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 matches up against the WB350F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung WB350F

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 WB350F 
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 WB350F GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
RevealedJanuary 2014February 2012More modern by 23 months
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung WB350F

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 WB350F 
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 enjoys outside dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has sizing of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

Look at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung WB350F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and the WB350F.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and WB350F is 69 and 90 respectively.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes simply by going through a spec sheet. The pic here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and WB350F.

Clearly, both the cameras have the same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizes. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 includes the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower depth of field less difficult. The more aged GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Portrait photography advice
Samsung WB350F Portrait photography advice
74
manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
provides face detect focus
supports RAW formats
40
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Street photography camera
55
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no moving screen
no image stabilization
heavier than others (550g)
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (276g)
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sports photography details
Samsung WB350F Sports photography details
48
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
max fps very slow (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
lack of phase detect auto focus
50
excellent zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Travel photography features
Samsung WB350F Travel photography features
59
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
heavier than others (550 grams)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
69
lighter than competition (276 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (23mm)
great reach (483mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Landscape photography camera
63
manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
MP count decent (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
no image stabilization
50
you can focus manually
pretty wide (23mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Vlogging highlights
Samsung WB350F Vlogging highlights
24
rather wide (24mm)
provides face detect focus
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have mic socket
heavier than others (550 grams)
34
pretty wide (23mm)
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (276g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
lack of microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung WB350F
 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5Samsung WB350F
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Samsung WB350F
Type Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2012-02-02 2014-01-07
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 370.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 4928 x 3264 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-85mm (3.5x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Max aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/2.8-5.9
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Screen resolution 920 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 180 seconds 16 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/3200 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 550 grams (1.21 lb) 276 grams (0.61 lb)
Physical dimensions 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 400 photos -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB-90 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) -
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Price at release $871 $260