Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB350F
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Revealed January 2014
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Following is a in depth assessment of the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung WB350F, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is pretty comparable but the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and WB350F (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was brought out 23 months before the WB350F which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summation of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 matches up against the WB350F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung WB350F. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery and Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung WB350F
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
WB350F | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | February 2012 | More modern by 23 months | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung WB350F
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 enjoys outside dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has sizing of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung WB350F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and the WB350F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and WB350F is 69 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes simply by going through a spec sheet. The pic here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and WB350F.
Clearly, both the cameras have the same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizes. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 includes the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower depth of field less difficult. The more aged GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung WB350F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung WB350F |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-02-02 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-85mm (3.5x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 550 grams (1.21 lb) | 276 grams (0.61 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-90 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $871 | $260 |