Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB35F
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d8e0/7d8e0c6ccb8d05257a2818cad25bd8279ac31704" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f91/52f9140fa7006285dc43ba7d1f1fb45d41f5684b" alt="Samsung WB35F front Samsung WB35F front"
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung WB35F, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively close but the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and WB35F (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was brought out 23 months earlier than the WB35F which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 scores versus the WB35F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung WB35F. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung WB35F
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
WB35F | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | February 2012 | Fresher by 23 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung WB35F
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has got outside measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") having a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung WB35F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 compared to the WB35F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca28d/ca28db3742eb483c97eff5aab297df35d5aabf0c" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and WB35F is 69 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67aa8/67aa8a780f35e639fea88aeb8e37bb25c94d6054" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing only by researching technical specs. The graphic below may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and WB35F.
As you can tell, both of those cameras provide the same megapixels albeit different sensor sizing. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 contains the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult. The older GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f7dc/8f7dcb3e8457e0b1ee6895e91301565d75b1fe15" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78570/785701cca0f359c2c62637946638dd30d7c222c2" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung WB35F |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-02-02 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-85mm (3.5x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 550 gr (1.21 pounds) | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-90 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $871 | $130 |