Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB750
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Announced September 2011
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Below is a comprehensive review of the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung WB750, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and WB750 (13MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and WB750 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was introduced 6 months later than the WB750 and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB750 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 scores versus the WB750 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 & Samsung WB750. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery & Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung WB750
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | WB750 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
WB750 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung WB750
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | WB750 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2012 | September 2011 | Similar age | |
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 offers external measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB750 has proportions of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung WB750 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 compared to the WB750.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and WB750 is 69 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading through specs. The photograph below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and WB750.
All in all, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will give more detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung WB750 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung WB750 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-02-02 | 2011-09-01 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4096 x 3072 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-85mm (3.5x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 180 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 550 grams (1.21 pounds) | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-90 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $871 | $339 |