Clicky

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB750

Portability
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
 
Samsung WB750 front
Portability
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Introduced February 2012
Samsung WB750
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
  • Announced September 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB750 Overview

Below is a comprehensive review of the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung WB750, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and WB750 (13MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and WB750 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was introduced 6 months later than the WB750 and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB750 being a Compact camera.

Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 scores versus the WB750 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung WB750

		

		

			
 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 WB750 
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

		

		

			
 WB750 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung WB750

		

		

			
 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 WB750 
AnnouncedFebruary 2012September 2011Similar age
Manual focus  Very precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size
Selfie screen  Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  Missing Touch friendly screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 offers external measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB750 has proportions of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung WB750 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 compared to the WB750.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB750 size comparison
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and WB750 is 69 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB750 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Oftentimes, its hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading through specs. The photograph below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and WB750.
All in all, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will give more detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively.
	
			Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB750 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Portrait photography with Samsung WB750
74
 has manual focus
 resolution is good (16MP)
 sensor size is nice (APS-C)
 offers face detect autofocus
 exports RAW files
41
 you can focus manually
 decent megapixels (13 megapixels)
 provides face detect autofocus
 external flash not possible
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Street Comparison
Street photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Street photography with Samsung WB750
55
 sensor size is nice (APS-C)
 exports RAW files
 screen is fixed
 no image stabilization
 more heavy than average (550 grams)
61
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 lighter than competition in class (193g)
 screen does not articulate
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
Photography Glossary
Sports Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sports photography info
Samsung WB750 Sports photography info
48
 resolution is good (16 megapixels)
 sensor size is nice (APS-C)
 max frames per second low (3.0 fps)
 no image stabilization
 doesn't have phase detect autofocus
51
 excellent zoom range (24-432mm  18.0 x zoom)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 decent megapixels (13MP)
 provides tracking focus
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Travel Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Travel photography factors
Samsung WB750 Travel photography factors
59
 resolution is good (16MP)
 built-in flash
 fairly wide (24mm)
 more heavy than average (550 grams)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly display
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
69
 lighter than competition in class (193 grams)
 decent megapixels (13MP)
 built-in flash
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 long reach (432mm)
 doesn't have Time Lapse function
 doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Landscape Comparison
 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Landscape photography camera
 Samsung WB750 as a Landscape photography camera
63
 has manual focus
 fairly wide (24mm)
 screen size is good (3")
 resolution is good (16 megapixels)
 sensor size is nice (APS-C)
 exports RAW files
 cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
 no image stabilization
48
 you can focus manually
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 pretty good screen size (3")
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 decent megapixels (13 megapixels)
 can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
 doesn't have Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Vlogging details
Samsung WB750 Vlogging details
24
 fairly wide (24mm)
 offers face detect autofocus
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly display
 no image stabilization
 video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
 no microphone jack
 more heavy than average (550g)
34
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 provides face detect autofocus
 high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 lighter than competition in class (193 grams)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
 doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
 doesn't have mic support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	

		

			
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung WB750
 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5Samsung WB750
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Samsung WB750
Category Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2012-02-02 2011-09-01
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 370.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 13 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3 and  16:9
Highest resolution 4928 x 3264 4096 x 3072
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW photos    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Autofocus touch    
Autofocus continuous    
Single autofocus    
Autofocus tracking    
Autofocus selectice    
Autofocus center weighted    
Multi area autofocus    
Live view autofocus    
Face detection autofocus    
Contract detection autofocus    
Phase detection autofocus    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-85mm (3.5x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch operation    
Screen technology TFT color LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 180 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash distance - 3.30 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe    
AE bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support    
Headphone support    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 550 grams (1.21 pounds) 193 grams (0.43 pounds)
Physical dimensions 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 400 photos -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB-90 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting    
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $871 $339