Clicky

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
69
Imaging
57
Features
45
Overall
52
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Released February 2012
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Released January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is relatively comparable but the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and WB800F (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was manufactured 11 months before the WB800F so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 matches up against the WB800F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung WB800F

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 WB800F 
Screen resolution920k460kSharper screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 WB800F GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
ReleasedJanuary 2013February 2012More recent by 11 months
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung WB800F

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 WB800F 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has exterior measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") and a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Examine the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus the WB800F.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and WB800F is 69 and 92 respectively.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor measurements purely by checking out specifications. The visual here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and WB800F.

Plainly, both the cameras provide the same megapixels albeit not the same sensor measurements. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has the bigger sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field easier. The older GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Portrait photography with Samsung WB800F
74
has manual focus
decent MP (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
comes with face detection focusing
supports RAW files
44
you can focus manually
decent MP (16MP)
provides face detect focusing
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Street photography info
Samsung WB800F Street photography info
55
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
heavier than others (550 grams)
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (218 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sports photography information
Samsung WB800F Sports photography information
48
decent MP (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
no phase detect AF
53
excellent zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Travel photography features
Samsung WB800F Travel photography features
59
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
heavier than others (550 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
69
lighter than competition (218g)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (23mm)
great reach (483mm)
missing Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Landscape photography camera
63
has manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
decent MP (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not have image stabilization
50
you can focus manually
rather wide (23mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Vlogging with Samsung WB800F
24
rather wide (24mm)
comes with face detection focusing
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic port
heavier than others (550 grams)
35
rather wide (23mm)
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focusing
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (218g)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing microphone socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung WB800F
 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5Samsung WB800F
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Samsung WB800F
Type Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2012-02-02 2013-01-07
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 370.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 4928 x 3264 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-85mm (3.5x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/2.8-5.9
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech TFT color LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 180 secs 16 secs
Max shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 550 grams (1.21 lbs) 218 grams (0.48 lbs)
Physical dimensions 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 400 images -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB-90 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Launch price $871 $300