Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d8e0/7d8e0c6ccb8d05257a2818cad25bd8279ac31704" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ca14/9ca142d32739840db34ee7f0cf455022f74377af" alt="Samsung WB800F front Samsung WB800F front"
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is relatively comparable but the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and WB800F (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was manufactured 11 months before the WB800F so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 matches up against the WB800F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 & Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung WB800F
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
WB800F | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2012 | More recent by 11 months |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung WB800F
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has exterior measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") and a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus the WB800F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25ab5/25ab5d2f0a4fadd0d99c0bdec0a6a709a9755551" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and WB800F is 69 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0eb3/e0eb316531104b187215cda86f921e8cf5b1bdff" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor measurements purely by checking out specifications. The visual here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and WB800F.
Plainly, both the cameras provide the same megapixels albeit not the same sensor measurements. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has the bigger sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field easier. The older GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90ea3/90ea3eb9875b5406527c9a3ac9b2517fcca336ba" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8104a/8104ad780551e4b1d06482a2d9e5ef7ff30675fc" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung WB800F |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-02-02 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-85mm (3.5x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 180 secs | 16 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 550 grams (1.21 lbs) | 218 grams (0.48 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $871 | $300 |