Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung SL102
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Also Known as ES55
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung SL102, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is pretty well matched but the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) and SL102 (1/2.3") offer different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 was brought out 21 months later than the SL102 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 scores versus the SL102 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 & Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Samsung SL102
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2010 | January 2009 | Fresher by 21 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
SL102 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Samsung SL102
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 enjoys outside measurements of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung SL102 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and the SL102.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and SL102 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizing simply by checking specifications. The visual below should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and SL102.
To sum up, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 will give greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more recent GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Samsung SL102 |
Otherwise known as | - | ES55 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-09-21 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR Engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 180 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 140 grams (0.31 pounds) | 116 grams (0.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $566 | $130 |