Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung TL220
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
95 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung TL220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 169g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Revealed August 2009
- Alternative Name is ST500
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung TL220 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Samsung TL220, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and the TL220 (12MP) is relatively comparable but the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) and TL220 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 was introduced 14 months after the TL220 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung TL220 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 grades versus the TL220 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung TL220 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 & Samsung TL220. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery & Samsung TL220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Samsung TL220
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | TL220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2010 | August 2009 | Newer by 14 months | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL220 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
TL220 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Samsung TL220
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | TL220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung TL220 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 enjoys external measurements of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") along with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) and the Samsung TL220 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 169 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Samsung TL220 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 against the TL220.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and TL220 is 88 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung TL220 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions just by checking out specs. The picture below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and TL220.
All in all, each of the cameras have got the exact same megapixels albeit different sensor dimensions. The GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 contains the bigger sensor which should make achieving shallow DOF less difficult. The more modern GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung TL220 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung TL220 Specifications
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Samsung TL220 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Samsung TL220 |
Alternate name | - | ST500 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-09-21 | 2009-08-13 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | GR Engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 140g (0.31 lbs) | 169g (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-90 | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $566 | $90 |