Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung TL240
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Additionally Known as ST5000
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung TL240, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is relatively close but the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) and TL240 (1/2.3") use different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 was released 9 months later than the TL240 and they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a simple view of how the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 grades against the TL240 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Samsung TL240. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Samsung TL240
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2010 | January 2010 | More recent by 9 months | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
TL240 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Samsung TL240
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has external measurements of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") having a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL240 has measurements of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung TL240 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 compared to the TL240.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and TL240 is 88 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements merely by researching a spec sheet. The graphic below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and TL240.
As you can see, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Samsung TL240 will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The fresher GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Samsung TL240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Samsung TL240 |
Otherwise known as | - | ST5000 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2010-09-21 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR Engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4334 x 3256 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.5 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 140g (0.31 lb) | 160g (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-90 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $566 | $171 |