Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB250F
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Samsung WB250F, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is very similar but the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) and WB250F (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 was unveiled 3 years before the WB250F which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summation of how the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 scores vs the WB250F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 & Samsung WB250F. The full galleries are available at Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Samsung WB250F
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
WB250F | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | September 2010 | Newer by 27 months | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Samsung WB250F
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 features external measurements of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has sizing of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Samsung WB250F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 versus the WB250F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and WB250F is 88 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading specs. The pic underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and WB250F.
All in all, the 2 cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Samsung WB250F will offer extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Samsung WB250F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Samsung WB250F |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-09-21 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | GR Engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180s | 16s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 140g (0.31 pounds) | 226g (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $566 | $250 |