Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB35F
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 versus Samsung WB35F, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) and WB35F (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 was released 4 years prior to the WB35F which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short view of how the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 matches up against the WB35F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Samsung WB35F. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Samsung WB35F
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
WB35F | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | September 2010 | More modern by 40 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Samsung WB35F
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 enjoys physical measurements of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has proportions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 versus Samsung WB35F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and the WB35F.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and WB35F is 88 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to see the difference between sensor sizes merely by checking a spec sheet. The pic here should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and WB35F.
Clearly, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Samsung WB35F will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images much more aggressively. The more aged GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Samsung WB35F |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-09-21 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR Engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 140 grams (0.31 pounds) | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-90 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $566 | $130 |