Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB700
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
98 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched December 2010
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 versus Samsung WB700, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) and WB700 (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 was unveiled 3 months prior to the WB700 and they are both of a similar age. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB700 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 scores versus the WB700 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 & Samsung WB700. The full galleries are available at Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Samsung WB700
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display resolution | 920k | 614k | Sharper display (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
WB700 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Samsung WB700
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2010 | December 2010 | Similar age | |
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 offers physical measurements of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) while the Samsung WB700 has measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 versus Samsung WB700 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 compared to the WB700.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and WB700 is 88 and 98 respectively.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The visual underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and WB700.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 having a larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Samsung WB700 will give you greater detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a bit more aggressively.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Samsung WB700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Samsung WB700 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-09-21 | 2010-12-28 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR Engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | - |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | () |
Highest aperture | f/2.5 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 140 grams (0.31 pounds) | - |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $566 | $300 |