Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB800F
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 versus Samsung WB800F, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) and WB800F (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 was announced 3 years prior to the WB800F which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 matches up versus the WB800F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Samsung WB800F
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
WB800F | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | September 2010 | More modern by 27 months | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Samsung WB800F
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has outside dimensions of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") having a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 versus Samsung WB800F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 versus the WB800F.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and WB800F is 88 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizes merely by researching specs. The pic below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and WB800F.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB800F will result in extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Samsung WB800F |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-09-21 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | GR Engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 140g (0.31 pounds) | 218g (0.48 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $566 | $300 |