Clicky

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
88
Imaging
53
Features
37
Overall
46
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28mm (F2.5) lens
  • 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
  • Launched September 2010
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Introduced January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB800F Overview

Lets examine more in depth at the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 versus Samsung WB800F, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) and WB800F (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 was announced 3 years prior to the WB800F which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.

Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 matches up versus the WB800F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Samsung WB800F

 GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 WB800F 
Display resolution920k460kSharper display (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

 WB800F GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 
IntroducedJanuary 2013September 2010More modern by 27 months
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Samsung WB800F

 GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 WB800F 
Manual focus Very accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has outside dimensions of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") having a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Check out the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 versus Samsung WB800F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 versus the WB800F.

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and WB800F is 88 and 92 respectively.

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

Usually, its tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizes merely by researching specs. The pic below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and WB800F.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB800F will result in extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 will be behind in sensor innovation.

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Portrait photography camera
58
focusing manually
sensor size is good (APS-C)
features face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
no liveview feature
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
44
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
includes face detection autofocus
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Street photography factors
Samsung WB800F Street photography factors
70
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
lighter than average in class (140g)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (218 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Sports photography camera
32
sensor size is good (APS-C)
fixed focal length (28mm)
no liveview feature
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
terrible battery pack (320 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
53
great zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Travel photography advice
Samsung WB800F Travel photography advice
59
lighter than average in class (140 grams)
flash built-in
terrible battery pack (320 shots)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
69
lighter than competition (218g)
decent megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (23mm)
long reach (483mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Landscape photography advice
Samsung WB800F Landscape photography advice
48
focusing manually
screen size is good (3 inches)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (12MP)
terrible battery pack (320 shots)
50
you can focus manually
pretty wide (23mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Vlogging information
Samsung WB800F Vlogging information
28
features face detection autofocus
lighter than average in class (140g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic support
35
pretty wide (23mm)
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (218 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external microphone support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Samsung WB800F
 Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5Samsung WB800F
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Samsung WB800F
Type Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2010-09-21 2013-01-07
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip GR Engine III -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 370.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 4288 x 2848 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Max aperture f/2.5 f/2.8-5.9
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech TFT color LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 180 secs 16 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 5.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 140g (0.31 pounds) 218g (0.48 pounds)
Dimensions 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 320 photos -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB-90 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Launch pricing $566 $300