Clicky

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB850F

Portability
88
Imaging
52
Features
37
Overall
46
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 front
 
Samsung WB850F front
Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
51
Overall
43

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28mm (F2.5) lens
  • 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
  • Introduced September 2010
Samsung WB850F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB850F Overview

On this page, we will be comparing the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB850F, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and WB850F (16MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) and WB850F (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 was launched 15 months before the WB850F which makes them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB850F being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 grades versus the WB850F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Samsung WB850F

 GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 WB850F 
Screen resolution920k614kClearer screen (+306k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

 WB850F GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 
RevealedJanuary 2012September 2010More modern by 15 months

Common features in the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Samsung WB850F

 GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 WB850F 
Focus manually Very accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen dimensions
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 features exterior dimensions of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") and a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) while the Samsung WB850F has dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") along with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).

Check out the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB850F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 compared to the WB850F.

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB850F size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and WB850F is 88 and 91 respectively.

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB850F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes simply by viewing specs. The image here may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and WB850F.

All in all, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Samsung WB850F will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB850F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Portrait photography info
Samsung WB850F Portrait photography info
57
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (APS-C)
features face detection focus
supports RAW formats
does not have liveview
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
43
has manual focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Street photography details
Samsung WB850F Street photography details
70
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
lighter than competition (140g)
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (250 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sports photography information
Samsung WB850F Sports photography information
32
decent sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (28mm)
does not have liveview
slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
bad battery pack (320 shots)
has no phase detect auto focus
52
long zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Travel photography information
Samsung WB850F Travel photography information
58
lighter than competition (140g)
built-in flash
bad battery pack (320 shots)
resolution not great (12MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
69
lighter than average (250 grams)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (23mm)
long zoom (483mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Landscape photography details
Samsung WB850F Landscape photography details
47
you can focus manually
good sized screen (3 inches)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
resolution not great (12MP)
bad battery pack (320 per charge)
49
has manual focus
really wide (23mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
Vlogging with Samsung WB850F
28
features face detection focus
lighter than competition (140 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
does not contain selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone port
34
really wide (23mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average (250g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of external mic jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Samsung WB850F
 Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5Samsung WB850F
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Samsung WB850F
Type Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2010-09-21 2012-01-09
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by GR Engine III -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 370.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4288 x 2848 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.5 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus range - 5cm
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dot 614 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology TFT color LCD AMOLED display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 180 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/3200 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 5.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 3.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 140g (0.31 lbs) 250g (0.55 lbs)
Physical dimensions 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 320 pictures -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model DB-90 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $566 $599