Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB850F
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Revealed January 2012
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB850F Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB850F, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and WB850F (16MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) and WB850F (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 was launched 15 months before the WB850F which makes them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB850F being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 grades versus the WB850F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 & Samsung WB850F. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery & Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Samsung WB850F
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | WB850F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 614k | Clearer screen (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
WB850F | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2012 | September 2010 | More modern by 15 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Samsung WB850F
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | WB850F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 features exterior dimensions of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") and a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) while the Samsung WB850F has dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") along with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB850F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 compared to the WB850F.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and WB850F is 88 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes simply by viewing specs. The image here may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and WB850F.
All in all, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Samsung WB850F will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Samsung WB850F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Samsung WB850F |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2010-09-21 | 2012-01-09 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR Engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | AMOLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 140g (0.31 lbs) | 250g (0.55 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-90 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $566 | $599 |