Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung SL102
84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Launched August 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung SL102, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is fairly comparable but the GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) and SL102 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GXR Mount A12 was brought out 2 years later than the SL102 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the GXR Mount A12 grades against the SL102 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Samsung SL102
GXR Mount A12 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2011 | January 2009 | Fresher by 32 months | |
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
SL102 | GXR Mount A12 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung SL102
GXR Mount A12 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR Mount A12 provides exterior measurements of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has sizing of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung SL102 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the GXR Mount A12 compared to the SL102.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the GXR Mount A12 and SL102 is 84 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to picture the difference in sensor sizing simply by checking out technical specs. The photograph below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR Mount A12 and SL102.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GXR Mount A12 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 will show greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The newer GXR Mount A12 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung SL102 |
Also called as | - | ES55 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-08-05 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/9000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.60 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 370 gr (0.82 pounds) | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (5 sec, custom) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $349 | $130 |