Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung SL202
84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Revealed August 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Other Name is PL50
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung SL202, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is relatively well matched but the GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) and SL202 (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GXR Mount A12 was announced 2 years later than the SL202 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the GXR Mount A12 matches up vs the SL202 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR Mount A12 & Samsung SL202. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Samsung SL202
GXR Mount A12 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2011 | February 2009 | Fresher by 30 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
SL202 | GXR Mount A12 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung SL202
GXR Mount A12 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has external measurements of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") having a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung SL202 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the GXR Mount A12 versus the SL202.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR Mount A12 and SL202 is 84 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing purely by checking specs. The photograph below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR Mount A12 and SL202.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GXR Mount A12 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 will give you extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more recent GXR Mount A12 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung SL202 |
Otherwise known as | - | PL50 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-08-05 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/9000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.60 m | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 370g (0.82 pounds) | 168g (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-90 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (5 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $349 | $140 |