Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung TL225
84 Imaging
52 Features
39 Overall
46
94 Imaging
34 Features
33 Overall
33
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Launched August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Released August 2009
- Alternative Name is ST550
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung TL225 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung TL225, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and the TL225 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) and TL225 (1/2.3") posses different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GXR Mount A12 was manufactured 2 years later than the TL225 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the GXR Mount A12 grades against the TL225 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR Mount A12 & Samsung TL225. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery & Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Samsung TL225
| GXR Mount A12 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2011 | August 2009 | More recent by 25 months | |
| Manually focus | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
| TL225 | GXR Mount A12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 1152k | 920k | Sharper screen (+232k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung TL225
| GXR Mount A12 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR Mount A12 enjoys physical measurements of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) and the Samsung TL225 has proportions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") with a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
See the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung TL225 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the GXR Mount A12 against the TL225.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR Mount A12 and TL225 is 84 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements just by reading through a spec sheet. The visual underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR Mount A12 and TL225.
Clearly, the two cameras feature the identical megapixels albeit different sensor measurements. The GXR Mount A12 provides the bigger sensor which will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult. The fresher GXR Mount A12 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
| Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung TL225 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung TL225 |
| Also called | - | ST550 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2011-08-05 | 2009-08-13 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 1,152 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/9000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 9.60 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 370 grams (0.82 pounds) | 187 grams (0.41 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-90 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (5 sec, custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $349 | $488 |